The researchers reported their findings in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) of the United States of America.
Phase contrast imaging is used in research labs with equipment that today is limited in use to imaging centimeter-scale samples of soft tissue. But, Häggmark says, the study clearly shows that it’s possible to do more with phase-contrast X-ray imaging, if the technical demands for clinical use can be engineered.
The chest radiography that clinics and hospitals use today plays an important role in detecting respiratory disease, but it is fundamentally limited by the way in which it generates images, Häggmark says.
He says that the promising phase-contrast technique used in the study could show subtle pathological changes that are otherwise invisible with conventional X-ray imaging, which is important when screening for diseases like asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
“Phase-contrast X-ray imaging can extract more information at higher resolution using the same amount of radiation dose as in conventional radiography,” Häggmark says.
In conventional radiography, the X-ray beam passes through the body, where it is absorbed along the way in different tissues by different amounts. On the other side, a detector measures the intensity of the beam—or what’s left of it—after it has been filtered through the body. This process is known as attenuation, and it’s the basic mechanism for providing the contrast that makes X-ray images useful.
The phase-contrast technique is a way of getting more information out of each X-ray beam. That’s because it’s possible to measure differences in the waveforms of X-rays that pass through a sample. X-ray beams encounter atoms and other structures that can change the position of the wave at any point in time—the phase—in relation to a reference wave. This phase information is used to generate an image that enhances structures in the sample, which in the human chest highlights the boundaries of bronchial walls and small airways with higher contrast and better resolution.
Häggmark says that one key to the method is to move the detector further away from the patient.
Development of equipment for imaging larger samples will take time, he says. “You need an X-ray source with both high power and a small emission spot,” he says. “Basically you need bright X-ray sources.”
He says that promising developments are being carried out, but it will take time for this to reach testing for human use,” he says.
“For now, simulations and virtual clinical trials are the perfect tools to explore what we can do when the source technology is ready.”
MEDICA-tradefair.com; Source: KTH The Royal Institute of Technology
